What is your personal Worldview?

The Free essays given on our site were donated by anonymous users and should not be viewed as samples of our custom writing service. You are welcome to use them to inspire yourself for writing your own term paper. If you need a custom term paper related to the subject of English Composition or What is your personal Worldview?, you can hire a professional writer here in just a few clicks.
What is your main worldview? My perception of the world is one that I have honored all my life. I don't force my opinion on others. I respect and welcome different beliefs and enjoy arguing their validity. A philosopher by the name of Foucault inspired me in 1993 when I first purchased a book written about his work. He reasons that knowledge is just what a group of powerful people get together and decide is true. Whether we are discussing what can be defined as normal or even more simply, words in general. His beliefs are so "on point" that I found myself holding them long before I knew others did. His is one of the many ideologies that I give credence to. What is knowledge? Well according to Foucault, "knowledge is power" (Foucault, 6). He doesn't mean it by insinuating that if you have knowledge then you will have power. He instead, means that if you have power then you may possess knowledge. This is so true, as in the government. Power does not mean majority. At the same time it does not mean that majority is definitely ruled out. In the case of the family hierarchy, (granted, this is a horrible example but one that does get the point across) if a situation arose that needed a resolution and a child gives an option, what happens? It gets ignored because the child is not one who has power in this structure. Regardless of whether or not it is right, the child's idea will not be given a second thought until an adult (party with power) says its right. Now to step up to a more universal plane. What is the truth? The truth is something that, once defined, determines humanity. "If they (those who have the power to create beliefs) can get enough people to believe what they have decided, then that may be more important than some unknowable truth" (Foucault, 8). An example that will illustrate this point is any situation giving before the 20th century. The position of the Earth, witchcraft, how crimes were handled publicly; all these examples prove that the majority can be mislead and still hold there beliefs as being truths. An example that will illustrate that there is no such thing as the truth would be a situation in which A tells B a lie. B believes A; therefore the lie becomes B's truth. Even though what was said was, in fact a lie according to B it is true. The same information is now both a lie and a fact. Who can honestly defend that in B's world his truth is a lie? Even the line between normality and abnormality leaves me to question who can define it? Those people in position of power. People who are mentally insane, or at least defined that way, are cursed to live with a label that may or may not suit them. Why must someone who is catatonic (one who doesn't move or speak for long periods of time) be looked at differently than everyone else? It is our differences that make us prosperous. We always hear the doctors defining normality by pointing out the abnormality of their patients but we never hear it the other way around. Why? "What they have to say has already been ruled irrelevant, because by definition they have no knowledge" (Foucault, 18). Another example that proves my point would be the acceptance of the burp in society and the vulgarity of the fart. What makes the two so different? Even for me to write the word fart makes me feel uncomfortable. I hate the shackles that society puts on me. I hate not knowing who to blame. Who said it is alright to do one and not the other? It upsets me that we are so set in our rules and regulations that we are limited to being who we all are. I believe that nothing is constant. I am, by no way near being a relativist but I do understand what they are trying to say. There is such a thing as right and wrong. Murder is wrong no matter how you look at it. But who is to say that murder is wrong. That is my point. Who is the person that decided that to kill another human is wrong but to kill an animal is justifiable if it benefits the killer? To hear this after being raised in this society must be a bit alarming. Don't worry, I'm not going to be the student who blames my philosophy teacher for my murdering spree. Even though I don't agree with the fact that ideas were unwillingly distilled in me does not mean that I don't agree with these same ideas. (Then again it could possibly be some sick inner power struggle that I'm going through because I don't like to live by other peoples rules.) The point I'm trying to make is that society could have just as easily gone the other way and said that murder is right and what would our universal truth then be? That murder is good. Which society would then be right? Who defines what is right anyway? I believe that religion was created to stop society from going chaotic. Those who held power in BC saw that their people were going crazy so they created this "high being" who happened to be "all powerful" and "all knowing" and who says that murder, lying and anything else that hurts another is bad. How fortunate! A similar example forces us to look at the Santa Clause figure. He also sees you all the time and if you are good then you will be rewarded with presents. Just as if you are good and you go to heaven (as in the case of my religious back round). If you were bad you would get coal from Santa Clause, something that produces fire which is found in hell. These things are no coincidence. They are just similarities due to someone's lack of imagination. Let's look at words. Nagel touched upon this in his book "What Does It All Mean?". Who said that the letters w o r d put together in that order would define what we now register as words? A cruel thing I did to a baby cousin of mine when she was 2 that I am not too proud of illustrates this argument.

Our inspirational collection of essays and research papers is available for free to our registered users

Related Essays on English Composition

The Stranger

Nicholas Alexander Bostic Period 2 February 20, 1997 AP English 6 My appeal was overthrown today. At least, that's what my lawyer said. It doesn't much matter to me, what's done is done. ...

read more

I am a truth-seeker. I am contemplative, rational, and logical. I constantly debate every concept presented to me in a cynical manner. I am very intuitive and my thinking is complex. I explore all...

read more
Racism In Literature

People have an inherent fear of what they don't know or what is different. This is the underlying concept behind the prejudices encountered by the protagonists in all of the stories I have read. Ign...

read more
the tale of roby McGee

Once, in the small town of Pentagram Village there lived a man named Robby McGee. He was a Little man, in body and in heart. Although Robby McGee was a butcher by day he was a monster by night. He ...

read more
Selfishness Versus Goodness and Hypocrisy Versus Candor

"My main object in this story was, to exhibit in a variety of aspects the commonest of all the vices: to show how Selfishness propagates itself; and to what a grim giant it may grow, from sm...

read more
Nothing can bring you peace but yourself.

Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. "Nothing can bring you peace but yourself." "Yourself,"… I am thinking about the time when my best friend died, and when I stopped being ...

read more