Aristotle asks "howd that get here?"

The Free essays given on our site were donated by anonymous users and should not be viewed as samples of our custom writing service. You are welcome to use them to inspire yourself for writing your own term paper. If you need a custom term paper related to the subject of Philosophy or Aristotle asks "howd that get here?", you can hire a professional writer here in just a few clicks.
As Aristotle viewed the world around him, he observed that things are moving and changing in certain ways. Aristotle discovered that certain things cause other things, which in turn cause something else. Aristotle believed that an infinite chain of c The first evidence that Aristotle viewed was the world around him. He observed that everything is in motion, and that one motion causes another motion and so on. Much like billiard balls on a pool table. One ball hits another ball, that ball moves, h s the heavens. In the heavens, Aristotle observed that everything was in a cyclical motion, and that the planets moved about each other in circles. If the planets moved about in circular motion then there must have been a cause to bring about their moti For Aristotle 'local motion is the primary type of motion and the primary type of motion is circular motion' For Aristotle this means that everything is moving, and the best form of movement is movement in a circular motion because a circle is the perf "If, then, the same thing always exists in a cycle something must always remain actually operating in the same way, And if there is to be a coming to be and perishing, then there must be something else that actually operates in one way at one time and It is necessary, here, to explain what Aristotle called potentiality and actuality. Potentiality is the faculty something has, and actuality is the realization of that faculty. One has the ability to be musical, that is, one has the potential to be mu so saying that motion is in the thing moved. For it is actuality of the thing moved, brought about by the agency of the mover." The last part of Aristotle's statement, "and hence either because of some or because of the first The best way to summarize the statement made above by Aristotle is to use the example of billiard balls. Imagine there are 4 billiard balls labeled A, B, C, and D. Ball B has the potential to move but needs a reason to move. Ball C moves and caused b becomes a cyclical motion each causing the other to move and indirectly causes its own motion. The last part of Aristotle's statement also mentions a first or prime mover. If one were to place 4 billiard balls on the table, they would simply sit there and do nothing, unless something moved them, or there was a prime mover of them. Even if they would have to act upon it. This account of cause and effect is at best problematic and troublesome. Aristotle has based all his knowledge on empirical evidence. Empirical evidence is not always perfect, and it is always possible to overlook something. Aristotle also did not s Aristotle based all his evidence for his proof of causation on the empirical world around him. Human perception is often mistaken, or overlooks things. The human notion of causation itself is problematic. The only reason we know that C causes B to mo t there is no other way to know causation, does not prove there is a prime mover. It may be that causation is infinite as far as our understanding can go. We, as humans, may be fully incapable of knowing what causation really entails, or how it can be t on we say that C causes B is because it has happened 9 out of 10 times. The only reason we know that there is any causation at all is because 9 out of 10 times two things have been observed together. If causation is nothing more than statistical probabi The other problem with Aristotle's argument is that one can infer ma

Our inspirational collection of essays and research papers is available for free to our registered users

Related Essays on Philosophy

Can we debate art?

subject = philosophy title = can we debate art? papers = Can we debate art? When I first began thinking about this topic, it seemed as if it was a fairly simple subject. Of course we could debate...

read more
Turing on Intelligence

Can computers ever be intelligent? Hollywood would like to think so. Ever since the early 1960s, free thinking machines have entered the mainstream of Science-Fiction films, from the evil "Hal" fr...

read more
The Stoic Citizen-politics of epictitus

The majority of authors reviewed in this course attempt to either describe an ideal state or to advise the reader on matters of ruling. This provides for interesting reading and speculation and may b...

read more
Descartes and Plato

Philosophy is a subject that can take many twists and turns before it finds an answer to a general question. Sometimes, an answer is still left unfound. Philosophy, in its broadest terms, can be descr...

read more
John Locke: Summary

John Locke: The Empiricist Theory of Knowledge: Summary Understanding and knowledge is what makes man superior to all other beings according to John Locke. However, the bounds of this understandi...

read more
The Paradox of Schizophrenia

In his book, The Paradoxes of Delusion, Louis Sass attempts to rebut two of most prevalent beliefs of the schizophrenic person. He argues that by viewing the ...

read more